Karachi, the epicenter of Pakistan, has virtually become a battlefield. The commercial hub once known for its ranking as a ‘Beta World City’ is now known for its cauldron. According to Mercer’s 2008 Quality of Living Survey, Pakistan is one of the lowest-scoring destinations with Karachi ranked 213. Karachi also happens to be one of the worst locations for personal safety, scoring a nominal 25.3.
I am, by no means, being pessimistic. I feel that the problems within Karachi’s society need to be highlighted so that possible and productive solutions can be discussed.
I believe that there are three grave issues that Karachi is currently wrapped by; ethnic conflicts, target killings, and the raging influence of land mafia. It is important to note that these problems are largely entwined with one another.
Ethnic conflicts in Karachi have prevalent ever since its inception. The first major ethnic riot erupted in the city in April 1985 claimed at least a hundred lives. This epidemic has been unstoppable ever since. Karachi is a multi-ethnic city and disparities between Mohajirs and the native groups (Punjabi, Pashto, etc) have been long present. It also happens to be one of the greatest causes of target killings in Karachi.
Target killings have caused massive unrest in Karachi. Political parties such as Muttahida Quami Movement (MQM) with a Mohajir majority, and Awami National Party (AWP) with a Pakhtun majority have been prominent in this regard. The apocalyptic situation in Karachi was further worsened after the demise of Dr. Imran Farooqui of MQM, last year. Sectarian differences have also triggered its rapid spread.
As per the records of the Citizens-Police Liaison Committee (CPLC), the city has witnessed the largest number of murders in the last fifteen years. According to a report in The Gulf Today, target killings in the city have claimed more lives than that of suicide bombing across the country this year. The paper stated that ‘The commercial hub has been plagued by extortion rackets and politically motivated killings that are responsible for the high number of people killed’.
Land mafia – a faceless monster has majorly contributed to the deadly downward spiral that the city has entered into. The aerial fighting, target killing, arson, and looting that Karachi is engulfed in are resultants of land mafia to a great extent.
It was also recently reported that land mafia has grabbed the land of the Karachi University (KU) and started construction work at the premises of the university illegally. It is a shame that land mafia has not even spared the grounds on which education breeds. What is even more devastating is the fact that the KU Engineering department has shown criminal negligence towards the issue and has provided support to the mafia by conducting a fake survey of the KU land.
I have established a model, the proper execution of which could serve as an antidote for the poison spreading in Karachi. It is what I call the ENRICH Model.
Educate
Negotiate
Reconcile
Implement
Commitment
Hope
This model comprises of four steps (Educate, Negotiate, Reconcile and Implement), with two elements that should be persistent throughout (Commitment and Hope).
One of the major reasons behind conflicts becoming uncontainable in the city is that those involved lack understanding about its root causes and possible solutions. Many wage war inadvertently, without visualizing the consequences their actions may carry. In addition, a prominent number of individuals may be fighting someone else’s battle. For peace to prevail in the city, it is key for people to be educated on the vainness of their violent endeavors.
The power of negotiation is undeniable but it is not a lopsided phenomenon. It requires diplomacy, mutual cooperation, compromise and tolerance. One needs to comprehend the fact that differences of opinion are only but inevitable when it comes to conflicts.
The process of reconciliation in terms of carving Karachi for the better would require the execution of two of its definitions; ending the disagreement and returning to friendly relations, and reconciling opposing ideas and facts. Until the decline of the Mughal Empire in the eighteenth century, Muslim rulers presided over South Asian kingdoms in which the majority of their subjects were Hindus. The exigencies of Muslim ascendancy in a non-Muslim environment led to the need for religious tolerance by the rulers and resulted in ‘syncretism’ in the religion as practiced by the local Muslims. Syncretism is a perfect example of reconciliation; it is the fusion of differing systems of belief, as in philosophy or religion, especially when success is partial or the result is heterogeneous. I believe that societal ‘syncretism’ would be highly effectual with regard to the conflicts in Karachi.
One must agree to disagree and think of the greater good. Even if one does not personally concur with a certain idea put forward, it should definitely be taken into consideration if it benefits the city. It is important to show all involved the benefits of changing, not what they will give up by changing.
As simplistic as the model may seem in writing, its execution can take ample time. However, with persistent commitment to one’s cause and hope that it will be accomplished, it is sure to have positive results.
It is time to revive the ‘truth, beauty, and goodness’ that Karachi was originally established upon.
So,
ENRICH today for an enriched tomorrow!